Actuality Entailments *
نویسندگان
چکیده
The term ‘actuality entailment’ was coined by Rajesh Bhatt in his 1999 dissertation to describe the implicative inference that arises when ability modals combine with perfective aspect. This article investigates the nature of this inference and the contributions of aspect and modality, by surveying the environments in which it is found. Prior to Bhatt’s dissertation, the literatures on aspect and modality were largely independent of each other. While some investigated whether certain aspects involve a modal component, very little work examined the interaction of distinct aspectual and modal operators. As actuality entailments question core assumptions about aspect and modality, their investigation has led to a fruitful reassessment and better understanding of both.
منابع مشابه
Actuality Entailments: When the Modality is in the Presupposition
In the context of the study of modality in interaction with time, the phenomenon whereby a modalized proposition entails its non-modal counterpart has been known as an ‘actuality entailment’ since Bhatt (1999). The question that actuality entailments raise is how modal statements can be distinguished from their non-modal counterparts and how modal contributes meaning. The main idea that the pap...
متن کاملStructure-Sensitivity in Actuality: Notes from a Class of Preference Expressions
The paper deals with the development of certain preference expressions (in particular 'rather') against the background of language change. Following results from narrow syntax, a diachronic reanalysis at the level of Logical Form is proposed. Synchronically, certain actuality entailments (Bhatt 1999/2006) are observed and a structural analysis capitalizing on Hacquard (2009) is proposed. This w...
متن کاملActuality Entailments and the Argument from Collapsed Duality
Modal expressions—expressions like ‘must’ and ‘can’—figure importantly in our ability to think and talk about things that are non-actual: people who are not actual (e.g., ‘There could have been a Tom Collins’1), events that did not happen (e.g., ‘He could have been spreading rumors’), ways in which events that happen do not happen (e.g., ‘Rome could have been built in a day’), etc. These expres...
متن کاملSemEval-2010 Task 12: Parser Evaluation Using Textual Entailments
Parser Evaluation using Textual Entailments (PETE) is a shared task in the SemEval-2010 Evaluation Exercises on Semantic Evaluation. The task involves recognizing textual entailments based on syntactic information alone. PETE introduces a new parser evaluation scheme that is formalism independent, less prone to annotation error, and focused on semantically relevant distinctions.
متن کاملA Preferential Framework for Trivialization-Resistant Reasoning with Inconsistent Information
Paraconsistent entailments based on more than two truthvalues are useful formalisms for handling inconsistent information in large knowledge bases. However, such entailments suffer from two major drawbacks: they are often too cautious to allow intuitive classical inference, and are trivialization-prone. Two preferential mechanisms have been proposed to deal with these two problems, but they are...
متن کامل